Regulation of digital advertising in the UK close
From March 2011 digital advertising falls more strictly under the remit of the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA). In short this means that any digital content in the UK that may result in or prompt a sale must now comply with the Committee on Advertising Practice (CAP) Codes on advertising.
This seemed to me like quite a big step and not one I fully understood. If you actually go to the ASA website you will find the CAP Code there but unless you are au fait with legal jargon and have a lot of time to spare you will be none the wiser. In essence I took the CAP Code to broadly mean, “don’t lie” but there had to be more to it than that.
Aside from the announcement itself I could not find much editorial on what the implications were. Thankfully the British Interactive Media Association (BIMA) that David is Vice –Chair of organised an event with lawyers Kemp Little to explain it all. The remainder of this blog post is shamelessly paraphrasing their excellent presentation.
Why the need to introduce changes?
Digital has woven itself into the fabric of our daily lives and is now the first port of call for our consumer decision-making research. Digital marketing has also become a lot more sophisticated. Banner ads and paid search are only part of the tool set for influencing businesses and consumers online.
It is worthy of note that £200 000 of the funding to extend the ASA came from Google whose paid-for listings were already being regulated (see next section). Why? Because Google needs the content appearing in it’s natural listings to satisfy the user and not mislead. They are protecting the authenticity of their brand.
Additionally there is growing concern in our society over the role of the Internet in the lives of our children, young people and vulnerable adults.
Between 2008-2009 the ASA had to reject 3500 complaints relating to content on websites that fell outside of their existing remit. The claims were often regarding misleading information.
So how is digital advertising regulated in the UK?
It would not be fair to say that digital has been unregulated in the UK prior to this year. In 2008 two pieces of legislation - Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations and Business Protection from Misleading Marketing Regulations - were passed through government. They were created in order to:
- Treat consumers fairly
- Not mislead through acts / omissions
- Stop aggressive commercial practices
- Stop misleading advertising
- Create a framework for comparative advertising
In effect this helped to put an end to hidden adverts on websites and also pushed bloggers to declare affiliation with a product they were seeding.
The ASA added a self-regulatory element into this mix. It may surprise you but they did actually have a limited digital remit prior to this year covering emails and advertisements in paid-for space including:
- Banner and pop-up advertisements
- Paid-for search listings
- Commercial classified adverts
- Paid-for listings on price comparison sites
- Sales promotions in paid-for and non-paid for space online (social networks)
Summary of the changes
The CAP Code now also applies to:
Advertisements and other marketing communications by or from companies, organisations or sole traders on their own websites, or in other non-paid-for space online under their control, that are directly connected with the supply or transfer of goods, services, opportunities and gifts, or which consist of direct solicitations of donations as part of their own fund-raising activities.
What you should take note of:
- The catchall term at the start
- That this excludes individuals selling online e.g. on Craig’s List
- That all content of social networks (not just paid-for space or obvious sales promotions) applies
- The fact that anything resulting in a sale is covered
- That this also includes charities
The following is exempt:
- Marketing communications that promote causes or ideas
- Investor Relations (that has enough regulation already!)
- Heritage advertising such as the old “Guinness is Good for You” campaign
User Generated Content is outside of the ASA unless it is adopted in marketing communications or is featured on your own website or online space under your control.
This could strike fear into the hearts of marketers but I think context is key. Consumer feedback as part of a chat flow is not going to be taken as a serious breach compared to say, highlighting the same feedback on the homepage.
What are marketers required to ensure then?
The CAP Code requires digital advertisements to be:
- “Legal, decent, honest and truthful”
- Socially responsible
- Prepared in line with the principles of fair competition
How is it enforced?
Although it is very unlikely that any financial penalties will occur for falling foul the ASA has an incremental scale of sanctions that it will follow:
- Most guilty cases will result in a public adjudication on their website (negative publicity that journalists looking for a story will pick up)
- Withdrawal of trading privileges
- Pre-vetting of future advertising (for repeat offenders)
- Referral to OFCOM (for extreme repeat offenders)
Agencies are also not allowed to submit any work that has breached the Code for any awards and media owners are permitted to refuse to run ads by offending companies.
The ASA can ask search engines to remove the marketer’s paid-for advertisements and can themselves place paid-for ads referring to a public adjudication. However they cannot impact upon natural search listings.
One thing that we do not know yet is just how SEO friendly these public adjudications might be in search results for a brand name. It could be that adjudications hang around for years. The impact could be extremely damaging to a brand.
What should you be aware of?
The lawyers I met at Kemp Little have already dealt with the ASA on behalf of digital clients and had these words of warning should you ever be investigated:
- They are not always consistent and their previous judgements do not set a legal precedent.
- They can raise their own issues so an investigation is not necessarily triggered by a complaint from the public.
- There do not need to be obvious grounds for a complaint to be investigated. Their remit is to protect the most gullible consumer.
- Just one complaint can trigger an investigation and the consumer’s identity is protected. This may lead to “guerrilla” complaints, for example a family member of a person working for a competitor who complains.
I hope this has been helpful and prompted you to think more about the new regulations. Although I am sure this will create a lot more red tape and hassle for some advertisers I am in favour of a more accountable, safer digital space. The more credible it is, the more we will continue to use it as the foundation for our future lives and thus further innovate and improve.
However, I do hope that the ASA keep a balance on what is fair and reasonable and that we don’t end up in a similar position to some of the ridiculous Health and Safety laws we currently have to abide by. I for one like to take the chance of drinking my coffee without a sealable lid on it and I also believe I have some good sense and judgement when it comes to spending my own money.
Please do let me know your thoughts in the comments below and thanks again to the lawyers at Kemp Little for all their help.